Monday, October 3, 2011

Upham Beach T-Groins Seriously Damaged


It seems that the brief vacation St. Pete Beach enjoyed from drama and hostility is now officially over.

As many SPB residents know, a fresh batch of litigation was recently served on the people of St. Pete 
Beach regarding the city's redevelopment efforts.

Frustrating?  Absolutely.  But there is more.  While walking on Upham Beach this weekend, I was shocked and dismayed to see that the geotextile erosion control structures (the "T-Groins") have already sustained substantial damage, only a few months after their installation and repair by Pinellas County.




As shown in the video and photos I took over the weekend, the nature and extent of this damage is substantial.  The thick, durable outer coating of these Geotubes has been marred by deep incisions, and large sections appear to have been torn away in a manner clearly inconsistent with natural wear and tear.

The geotube T-Groins do a great job of withstanding the waves and holding sand on the beach.  The damaged sections will be patched by Pinellas County, and hopefully there will be no further damage.


Sunday, August 7, 2011

At long last, all is well in St. Pete Beach!



Last night, for the first time in years, Edel and I went directly on to Upham Beach from the back gate of Starlight Tower, and went for a pleasant sunset walk on sand that was freshly deposited by the County's beach renourishment program.

But we didn't get far. Only 100 steps later we encountered a crowd of tourists who were happily settling down in a large circle to watch the Fire Dancers, a small band of fire-wielding bellydancers, (sponsored by the proprietors of the local Russian restaurant St. Petersburg Nights), whose appearance on Upham Beach on the first Saturday of each month supplements the exotic and unique beauty of the sunsets of St. Pete Beach. The sun was just beginning to set, and the dancers were teaching a handful of brave beachgoers some dance moves while their assistants were dousing various props with gasoline in preparation for the show.
Then darkness came and the show began. And as I beheld the many faces, young and old, delightedly transfixed by the spectacle of beautiful dancers, whirling flaming scimitars and the glowing, crimson Upham Beach sunset, I realized that this was a perfect ending to what has been a remarkably good week for St. Pete Beach.
























As a beach preservation activist, I was very pleased to be among the many tourists who were walking, playing and enjoying a beach that has been refreshed and preserved by the beach renourishment and geotextile T-groins installed during the recently-completed county/state/federal beach preservation project. But for that hard-fought project, that wonderful place would have had no sand, no beautiful dancers, and no tourists to enjoy them.



The week
also brought the excellent news that funding has been approved for the Pinellas Bayway project, which will replace the old, decaying drawbridge with a shining new bridge that will greatly ease congestion and improve traffic-flow on the south end of our island.
We also learned that Commissioner Bev Garnett was cleared of the last of the many ethics complaints filed against her by her rival/nemesis Harry Metz.

The City also recently filed a motion to dismiss the appeal currently pending with regards to the seemingly endless litigation regarding the City's redevelopment initiatives.

And, finally, we learned this week that the City of Yankeetown has filed a lawsuit to overturn the legislation that was recently passed that bans putting comprehensive plans to a vote.  Imagine that, litigation involving land use regulation and comprehensive plans, and St. Pete Beach isn't involved!


 The past few years have been very rough on the people of St. Pete Beach, but I think the events of this week are a wonderful sign of how far we have come, and how well the efforts of the city have been rewarded.
Because  of the efforts of our Mayors and Commissioners, our beaches are larger and more stable than they were just a few years ago, which draws more tourists and preserves and grows our local economy. Our new comprehensive plan has finally been freed from the shackles and constraints of litigation, so the redevelopment of our city can finally begin to take shape. The divisiveness and contention that once roiled our City Commission has been mercifully replaced with respectful, thoughtful, and responsible deliberation.


And, for the first time since I can remember, the headlines about strife, lawsuits and Comprehensive Plans are not featuring our city.

I never thought I'd have the pleasure of saying this, but if this week is any indication of the times to come, then, at long last, it may be safe to say aloud that all is well in St. Pete Beach.




Sunday, May 22, 2011

Red Light Cameras: The Next Lawsuit Nightmare for St. Pete Beach

Like many St. Pete Beach residents, I am pleased and relieved that our city has enjoyed a few months respite from the caustic and divisive rhetoric about condo canyons and the Right to Vote.  We deserve a break.  We need a break.  And with any luck, the present state of relative tranquility will become the New Normal in St. Pete Beach.


The staggering legal costs of the St. Pete Beach development war has taken a huge toll on our city's resources.  The last thing we need is a whole new issue that will cost the city even more legal fees.


That's why I was more than a little disturbed when I saw this morning's May 22, 2011 St. Pete Times Story about the rising number of successful and costly legal challenges to Red Light cameras.  This story reveals that clever lawyers are successfully challenging Red Light Camera fines/tickets, and are causing cities that have installed those cameras to incur substantial legal fees defending those fines/tickets.  As a result, city legal fees relating to red light cameras are increasing, cities are being forced to hire additional personnel to review the camera videos, and the increased number of legal challenges is taxing city resources and causing a backlog of unprocessed tickets, which leads to more tickets subject to legal challenge, which leads to more lawyers and lawsuits, which leads to more legal fees....


It is my understanding that Red light cameras have been marketed to the St. Pete Beach Commission as not only a means to reduce accidents, but also as a source of revenue from the traffic fines the cameras generate, and that the last city commission approved an ordinance allowing the installation of red light cameras in our city.


I was not able to attend the commission meeting when this ordinance was debated.  However, I'd bet my fiddle that the commission wasn't aware of the alarming trend of increased legal challenges and legal costs associated with the implementation of Red Light Cameras.


I think the new commission needs to thoroughly examine the potential for increased legal fees and expenses before taking any action to install and implement Red Light Cameras on St. Pete Beach.  Otherwise, we may be adding Ted Hollander to the list of lawyers who make their living suing our beautiful city.